Lone Star Steakhouse Going Private; How Do Competitors Look If Any Are Next?
So Lone Star Steakhouse (STAR) is going private at a 15% premium. This looks like an acquisition through an affiliate of Lone Star Funds, a private equity group out of Dallas. The company is being acquired for a $27.10, compared to its $23.70 price today. To be frank, it has been somewhat surprising that there haven't been any other steakhouse acquisitions since they have proven to have steady cash flows (the well run ones that is). Other restaurants fall in the same boat, and the brief economic blips that the companies face have proven time after time to be temporary and something that a private company can easily endure.
Earlier this month it released its 6 week same store Sales: Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon Inc. said Wednesday same-store sales declined 5.5 percent at the company's namesake chain in the six weeks ending July 25; +0.9% at the company's Texas Land & Cattle Steak House chains, +4.4% at Sullivan's Steakhouse restaurants and +11.8% at Del Frisco's Double Eagle Steak House restaurants.
See how this pairs up with other restaurants. We eliminated the high growth and high beta names, and most are either steakhouse or theme restaurants. We eliminated any that didn't have some degree of predictability and ease of transition. The only exception to the rules was Smith & Wollensky, but they have been so poorly run that anyone could do a better job. We also tried to eliminate those that have not been regularly profitable and those that can have a huge business disruption merely because of one event, although that is pretty difficult to stand up to.
Earlier this month it released its 6 week same store Sales: Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon Inc. said Wednesday same-store sales declined 5.5 percent at the company's namesake chain in the six weeks ending July 25; +0.9% at the company's Texas Land & Cattle Steak House chains, +4.4% at Sullivan's Steakhouse restaurants and +11.8% at Del Frisco's Double Eagle Steak House restaurants.
See how this pairs up with other restaurants. We eliminated the high growth and high beta names, and most are either steakhouse or theme restaurants. We eliminated any that didn't have some degree of predictability and ease of transition. The only exception to the rules was Smith & Wollensky, but they have been so poorly run that anyone could do a better job. We also tried to eliminate those that have not been regularly profitable and those that can have a huge business disruption merely because of one event, although that is pretty difficult to stand up to.
Here is the comparison list:
| Chain Name (Ticker) | Mkt Cap | P/E | ROE % | Debt/Equity | Px/Book |
| Darden (DRI) | 5.35B | 16.993 | 27.025 | 0.56 | 4.377 |
| Brinker Int'l (EAT) | 3.16B | 15.298 | 19.663 | 0.465 | 2.936 |
| OSI Restraurant (OSI) | 2.23B | 18.951 | 10.172 | 0.243 | 1.832 |
| Ruby Tuesday (RI) | 1.46B | 15.282 | 18.521 | 0.715 | 2.778 |
| Papa John's Pizza (PZZA) | 1.08B | 20.564 | 34.012 | 0.288 | 6.898 |
| RARE Hospitality (RARE) | 970.94M | 18.243 | 12.114 | 0.087 | 2.075 |
| Landry's (LNY) | 628.57M | 17.17 | 7.062 | 1.603 | 1.177 |
| Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon | 501.55M | 22.493 | 3.49 | NA | 1.197 |
| Ruth's Chris (RUTH) | 458.73M | 29.819 | N/A | 0.538 | 8.818 |
| Morton's (MRT) | 250.80M | N/A | -15.778 | 0.358 | 1.82 |
| Smith & Wollensky (SWRG) | 39.86M | N/A | -5.328 | 0.249 | 0.899 |
Jon C. Ogg
August 18, 2006

<< Home